The New York Times rarely misses an opportunity to identify conservative political leaders whom reporters and editors dislike. They are reported as ultra-conservative, far right, rightest, reactionary, die-hard, bourgeois, hidebound –you name the right adjective. But when a socialist or Marxist revolutionary becomes a one-party dictator, he or she gets an adjective-free ride . Example was in a New York Times story, as published in the Boston Globe, Aug 24,… Read Article →